Polina has been suspended from twitter.
Sulla Felix. archived some more posts though.
I don’t necessarily agree with everything here, but it’s extremely thought provoking. I’ve added linebreaks to make it easier to read.
Now don’t pin anything on me, but I’ll take a stab at it, and I’m gonna try to use as clear an example as possible: How did we see and treat homosexuals a few generations back (or look at the Westboro Baptist church for a more recent example)
Well, look at how we treat peadophiles today, and you have your answer
and there is a problem
You see, (today) we accept homosexuality because it’s done between people that can give informed consent something we will NEVER accept in peadophelia since informed consent is not present
BUT (and here’s the trouble)
WHAT is homosexuality? -> Sexual attraction to the same sex
WHAT is Peadophelia? -> Sexual attraction to pre-adolescent children(/Minors)
Now, pay heed, we are not talking about child rapists here There is not so much a push for ‘legalization’ of peadophelia, but like homosexuality, some people are starting to wonder if it is a legitimate sexual preference (instead of the mental illness we also accused homosexuals of just a few generations ago)
For an ideology of SJWs hell-bent on ‘protecting the oppressed’ it’s no surprise the dialog about peadophiles starts there because let’s face it, they are the most persecuted group of people currently around
But as you stated, society is obsessed with the ‘evil’ that is peadophelia, like the church was with heretics, the Nazis with Jews and the Westboro Baptists with gays
I disagree, You’re not looking five -100steps ahead of that.
Since men aren’t marrying, and still fail to realize how important women are to civilize them, they will continue to be mass manipulated, yes much like women, NOW the STATE AND CORP will now make their fetishes for them vis via men’s perverted need to watch porn daily…This here will make it possible. (Already Done)
Porn is not a freedom issue, much like democracy it’s a slavery issue. It does so much harm top the male mind, psyche, and autonomy, I’m really surprised how much porn is still consumed. Men will become impotent, and hyper sexualized with degenerate turn ons, this will turn the little relationships left to the gutter, women will not tolerate that sort of perversion more than a few decades. Leak outrageous pedo stories, that are made to make us all revolt in anguish and disgust, but continually leak them out over the years, in the attempt to make it appear that 10% of the pop are pedo’s instead of less than a percent-(already done)
Mass migrate 70 percent PLUS young migrant brown savage men into your countries, wherein FORTY PERCENT ADMIT WITH NO PROBLEM AT FUCKING ALL,,,THEY GANG RAPE, INCLUDING SIX YEAR OLDs. If you don’t think we are a pedo culture and pan sexualism within 2 decades, you’re not as smart as the one’s manipulating you. This is NOT an attack, this is a call to fucking wake up, stfu about you’re dumb ass white guilt, stop believing you’re country will be the same with darker people, start loving the god damn freedoms people died for by the millions so THEIR PEOPLE, NOT JUAN, NOT MUHAMMAD, could enjoy those damn freedoms, and money, and be sane, rational thinkers like the good god damn best people who lived on this earth were, whites from 1-2 centuries ago. Don’t act like the trash whites of today, act like it’s 1881 aka like your betters. Right is Right, Left is for losers that’ need the state.
Human Bio-Diversity (HBD) is an extremely contentious topic. Anyone even close to the progressive end of the political spectrum will immediately accuse you of “scientific racism” (or perhaps scientific sexism), or just straight racism if you start to bring it up. This is of course, ridiculous, but I have a theory as to why they believe this.
The progressive vehemently believes in spite of all the evidence that everyone is absolutely equal at birth, they are blank slates and that any difference is the result of environmental factors like culture. This is absolutely not the case for a wide variety of factors including height, intelligence, propensity for violence, skin colour, eye colour, vulnerable locations on the body, etc. Thus under the mantra of the blank slate, inequality is the result of prejudice that pushes people into less than optimal positions, which is of course wrong because it is denying them the freedom of their totally unbound, unrestricted state of birth. This does of course give progressives an enormous amount of power, whenever there is any perceived inequality they can sound the horns of racism, misogyny, ableism, sexism, or any other kind of ‘ism’ prejudice. This has been extremely powerful over the past decades, but recently the heavy abuse has made it far less effective,
Their reaction against any implication of human biodiversity that is more than skin deep is, I believe, twofold. First, it would deprive them of their power over both individuals, corporations, and even their own governments. The second is a little more complicated. They believe in tabula rasa, the blank slate, and that the only acceptable position that logically follows is the Progressive Doctrine. It is then understandable how they believe that if human biodiversity is true, that the only possible position one could hold is of of the Ku-Klux Klan. They have been told this over and over of course.
But it is ridiculous. Acceptance of HBD does not entail KKK membership. Slavery advocacy does not logically follow from HBD. As HBD-chick states;
there is nothing — absolutely nothing — about hbd that precludes left-wingers from acknowledging its existence. you can … still be all for the proletarian revolution and redistribution of wealth or even just be a mainstream democrat…
…what you can’t be if you understand hbd is be a progressive
Acceptance of HBD does not make one a slavery advocate. It does not undo the 2000 years of moral advancement that Western Civilization has made. Non-progressive Christians ended the slave trade and slavery, and were freeing slaves (including manumission) since the days of the early church.
Don’t let others tell you what you believe.
I occasionally write rants and don’t post them, but now I have. This is partially a response to a post I saw somewhere else.
1st generation immigrants have less criminal tendencies than native-born citizens.
When were those stats gathered? When 1st gen immigrants were still mostly people from either Europe, or they were from when there wasn’t tonnes of welfare, so the people coming across were essentially the cream of the crop who had to integrate to survive? Let’s not forget that while the first generation have less criminal tendencies the same does not hold for subsequent generations.
The problem here isn’t immigration per se, it’s mass immigration and illegal/undocumented refugee immigration. You’ve got some African diplomat saying that the people going to Europe now are human trash. (If you know what’s going on there, you might be inclined to agree) You’ve got those existing immigrants, the 1st genners you talk about, scared because the people they escaped from are now following them! And those that try to fix it? They’re extremists!
Oh don’t forget that it’s a regular practice for men in Afghanistan and surrounding areas to rape boys because “they’re just boys.”
So many of them have massive psychological issues because they’re a part of a gigantic inter-generational cycle of soul-destroying abuse. Is it any wonder they do things like killing volunteers who help them.
Or this: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3731005/Austrian-mayor-says-town-Afghan-migrants-carrying-sexual-assaults-locals-discuss-setting-vigilante-patrols-deal-problem.html
I’m a 3rd generation immigrant myself, but my grandparents adapted, they built a place here they earned enough money to make a good life by working hard and not spending a dime that they didn’t ABSOLUTELY NEED TO. They sent their kids to schools where they basically became natives. The people who are coming across are not like that now. Especially/mostly the Muslims. They have their special Islamic schools, their special Islamic food, and all this stuff that keeps them segregated. That’s not how you have a society. That’s how you generate ethnic conflict.
angry white men, whites have privilege, etc. White people have all the power, you’re an angry white man.
Though I have uncles you’d call “people of colour”, I have white skin, because lol genetics. (Other things are telltale though, I can remember getting comments when I was younger). Not that it fucking matters. If I dismissed a black man’s grievances because he was an “angry black man” I’d be socially crucified.
Lets talk about white male privilege though.
Point. Tim Hunt, nobel prize winner lost his job and most of his positions because HE MADE A JOKE and then black female journalist lied about it and said he insulted all women everywhere.
Point. Matt Taylor, who landed a probe on a comet wore a T-shirt that a female friend made him during his proudest moment, but some feminists didn’t like it so he reaped the politically correct whirlwind, resulting in a sobbed apology on national TV.
Then there’s the CEO of Mozilla, who happened to give some of his own private money to a cause he supported, a cause that was not endorsed by the left. Years later this came to light and deemed ‘unforgivable’ so he resigned during the media blitzkrieg.
Those are just some high-profile examples. If the most respected and successful white men are easily destroyed because they made a joke that someone didn’t like, or they wore a shirt that someone didn’t like, or supported a cause that someone didn’t like, what chance to the rest of us have?
But even as those things are happening, there are academics saying that whiteness, white people, etc have all the privilege, that they are inherently racist need to be destroyed, eradicated, and wiped out. They say all white people have privilege, even the homeless white man freezing on the street.
”White people cannot exist as white and do anything to address racism, because whiteness in action is racism.”
“Is it the duty of every good revolutionary to kill every newborn White baby?” – Jose Angel Gutierrez, a communist.
“We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him” – Jose Angel Gutierrez, Chicano activist and university professor.
I could go on. Malcom X, other people like that, current BLM, they all HATE white people (or even black people who are “too white”), and it is totally fine, it is not “lose your job” territory to support these people.
Think they might have had an effect on these people? Muslims aren’t the only people killing white people who help them. But they don’t just kill whites, they also dehumanise blacks that are too white.
But GOD FORBID you believe that people are better off with their own kind, and that everyone has the right to be ruled by their own people, including white people.
I’ve seen it said that the white men are just angry that the media doesn’t care about them anymore. Wrong. The media cares about white men. We wish that they didn’t, because apathy would be preferable to the hate.
We’re being demonised again, and have started finally looking out for each other, because nobody else is looking out for us, except for a tiny minority of some other groups.
Why do white men have to look out for everyone else, except ourselves (because whites liking being white is racist), but nobody is expected to return the favour?
This “all whites are racist” crap has destroyed race relations in America.
It’s destroying a lot of other things too, because racism is now the original sin of the left that every single white person is guilty of, no matter what. Unlike Christianity, there’s not even a chance of redemption, other than suicide. That’s what’s happening, on a cultural and national scale.